SIMPSON

v.

FLORIDA

Citator

Cited By

• Autley Mobley v. State, 409 So. 2d 1031 (Fla. 1982)
  …sentence. Appellants argue that section 870.03 is unconstitutionally vague and that it violates their right to freedom of assembly. These arguments mimic the arguments found wanting in State v. Simpson, 347 So. 2d 414 (Fla.1977), appeal dismissed, 434 U.S. 961, 98 S.Ct. 498, 54 L.Ed.2d 447 (1977), and State v. Beasley, 317 So. 2d 750 (Fla.1975). In Beasley we upheld the constitutionality of section 870.01(2), Florida Statutes (1973), which prohibits riots, by construing the statute in terms of the commo…
• The Honorable Robert M. Deehl v. Knox, 414 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
  …irst amendment overbreadth objection which would admittedly have been well-taken if only the actual verbiage of the statutes were considered. Mobley v. State, 409 So. 2d 1031 (Fla.1982); State v. Simpson, 347 So. 2d 414 (Fla.1977), appeal dismissed, 434 U.S. 961, 98 S.Ct. 498, 54 L.Ed.2d 447 (1977); State v. Beasley, 317 So. 2d 750 (Fla.1975). These cases are controlling and determinative of the one at bar. In contrast to several cases in which a constitutional statutory construction was precluded by a c…
• United States v. Moore, 613 F.2d 1029 (D.C. Cir. 1979)
  …are note 72 supra. . United States v. Mitchell, supra note 82, 397 F.Supp. at 177; United States v. Mazzei, supra note 82, 400 F.Supp. at 19. In United States v. Beasley, 550 F. 2d 261, 266 (5th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Kramer v. United States, 434 U.S. 961, 98 S.Ct. 496, 54 L.Ed.2d 323 (1977), the court left open the question whether § 1623(d)’s prerequisites were to be given a conjunctive or disjunctive interpretation. . United States v. Enmons, 410 U.S. 396, 411, 93 S.Ct. 1007, 1015, 35 L.Ed.2d 379…