CARGILE ET AL.

v.

MICHIGAN

Citator

Cited By

• Squirtco v. The Seven-Up Co., 628 F.2d 1086 (8th Cir. 1980)
  …ed 444 U.S. 932, 100 S.Ct. 277, 62 L.Ed.2d 190 (1979). Therefore, we must uphold the trial court’s finding of likelihood of confusion unless it is clearly erroneous. Gemeinde Brau, Inc. v. Amana Society,. 557 F. 2d 638, 639 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 967, 98 S.Ct,. 511, 54 L.Ed.2d 454 (1977); Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a). The facts were open to dispute, and it is quite possible that we would have reached a different conclusion on the infringement issue if this case were before us de novo. There is adequate su…
• Metric & Multistandard Components Corp. v. Metric's, Inc., 635 F.2d 710 (8th Cir. 1980)
  …the court may well determine that this is the type of “exceptional” case for which an award of attorney’s fees is appropriate. See Amana Society v. Gemeinde Brau, Inc., 417 F.Supp. 310 (N.D.Iowa 1976), aff’d, 557 F. 2d 638 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 967, 98 S.Ct. 511, 54 L.Ed.2d 454 (1977). Affirmed. . The evidence also shows that Metric & Mul-tistandard Components Corporation was commonly referred to as “Metric”; the appellee used the Name “Metric” on its stationery, its advertising literature a…
• McLEARN v. Cowen & Co. & Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, 660 F.2d 845 (2d Cir. 1981)
  …court may raise the issue of subject matter jurisdiction at any time, sua sponte. E. g., Clerk v. Paul Gray, Inc., 306 U.S. 583, 59 S.Ct. 744, 83 L.Ed. 1001 (1939); see United States v. Burmah Oil Co. Ltd., 558 F. 2d 43, 46 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 967, 98 S.Ct. 511, 54 L.Ed.2d 454 (1977). Moreover, “[although the rule requires a motion for relief from the judgment, it has been held that the court on its own motion may set aside a void judgment provided notice has been given of its contemplated a…