RINALDI

v.

HOLT, RINEHART & WINSTON, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (55 total)

• Marcus v. Shapiro, Abramson & Schwimmer, P.A., 620 So. 2d 1284 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)
  …“post-effective developments which materially alter the picture presented in the registration statement must be brought to the attention of public investors.” Id. at 1095. See also A.J. White & Co. v. S.E.C., 556 F. 2d 619 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 969, 98 S.Ct. 516, 54 L.Ed.2d 457 (1977). Manor Nursing does not require that the defendant know about the fraud at the [*1288] time the investor signs the agreement. Rather, the investor must be informed of any action that occurs after signing the con…
• California v. Carney, 471 U.S. 386 (U.S. 1985)
  …nder Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U. S. 443 (1971). United States v. Montgomery, 620 F. 2d 753, 760 (CA10) (“camper”), cert. denied, 449 U. S. 882 (1980); United States v. Clark, 559 F. 2d 420, 423-425 (CA5) (“camper pick-up truck”), cert. denied, 434 U. S. 969 (1977); United States v. Lovenguth, 514 F. 2d 96, 97 (CA9 1975) (“pick up with . . . camper top”); United States v. Cusanelli, 472 F. 2d 1204, 1206 (CA6) (per curiam) (two camper trucks), cert. denied, 412 U. S. 953 (1973); United States v. Miller,…
• United States v. Dennis, 625 F.2d 782 (8th Cir. 1980)
  …h Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 910, 97 S.Ct. 1184, 51 L. Ed.2d 587 (1976). Denial of severence is not a ground for reversal unless clear prejudice and abuse of discretion are shown. United States v. Losing, 560 F. 2d 906 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 969, 98 S.Ct. 516, 54 L.Ed.2d 457 (1977). A showing of prejudice resulting in denial of motion to sever requires more than a showing of a better chance of acquittal at separate trials. United States v. Bohr, supra, 581 F. 2d 1294. Inevitably, some pre…