ARZATE

v.

TEXAS

Citator

Cited By

• Sparkman v. McFARLIN, 601 F.2d 261 (7th Cir. 1979)
  …0) (adopting district court opinion); Hill v. McClellan, 490 F. 2d 859, 860 (1974); Humble v. Foreman, 563 F. 2d 780, 781 (1977); Perez v. Borchers, 567 F. 2d 285, 287 (1978); Sixth Circuit: Kurz v. Michigan, 548 F. 2d 172, 175 (1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 972, 98 S.Ct. 526, 54 L.Ed.2d 462 (1977); Ninth Circuit: Haldane v. Chagnon, 345 F. 2d 601, 604-05 (1965); Briley v. California, 564 F. 2d 849, 858 (1977); Tenth Circuit: Bottone v. Lindsley, 170 F. 2d 705, 707 (1948), cert. denied, 336 U.S. 944, 69 S.C…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Ingram Corp. & Ingram Contractors, Inc. v. J. RAY McDERMOTT & Co., Inc., 698 F.2d 1295 (5th Cir. 1983)
  …jurisdiction over pendent state claims.”) REA Express, Inc. v. Travelers Insurance Co., 554 F. 2d 1200 (D.C.Cir.) cert. denied, 434 U.S. 858, 98 S.Ct. 182, 54 L.Ed.2d 131 (1977); Kurz v. State of Michigan, 548 F. 2d 172, 175 (6th Cir.) cert. denied; 434 U.S. 972, 98 S.Ct. 526, 54 L.Ed.2d 462 (1977) (“Since all portions of the claims on this cause of action which arise under federal law have now been dismissed, the state law claims are no longer pendent and must be dismissed likewise.”); Randall v. Goldmark,…
• Dunn v. The State OF Tenn., 697 F.2d 121 (6th Cir. 1982)
  …cause of a prosecution. We think, therefore, that the statute of limitations in question begins to run at the time of the termination of the state proceeding. This Court, in Kurz v. State of Michigan, 548 F. 2d 172, 174 (6th Cir.1977), cert. denied 434 U.S. 972, 98 S.Ct. 526, 54 L.Ed.2d 462 reh’g denied 434 U.S. 1089, 98 S.Ct. 1289, 55 L.Ed.2d 796 (1978), questioned the dismissal of a 1983 malicious prosecution claim for untimeliness. The Court recognized that under state law the action accrued on the date…