UNITED STATES
v.
SMITH ET UX.

U.S. | 1977-12-05
No. 76-1243
434 U.S. 978 Supreme Court of the United States (1977) Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Nat'l Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Brinkworth, 680 So. 2d 1081 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)
    …to review. It is up to the NCAA to interpret its own rules, not the judiciary. See Rewolinski, 444 So. 2d at 58; see also Regents of the University of Minnesota v. The National Collegiate Athletic Ass’n, 560 F. 2d 352, 372 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 978, 98 S.Ct. 600, 54 [*1085] L.Ed.2d 472 (1977). The NCAA followed fair procedures in allowing the university the opportunity to state its case on behalf of the student-athlete, including an appeal within the NCAA when dissatisfied with the initial rul…
  • Dataphase Sys., Inc. v. C L Sys., Inc., 640 F.2d 109 (8th Cir. 1981)
    …Version 1929). . For cases applying the so-called “traditional test,” see Modern Controls, Inc. v. Andreakis, 578 F. 2d 1264, 1267 n.4 (8th Cir. 1978); Regents of the University of Minnesota v. NCAA, 560 F. 2d 352, 365 (8th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 434 U.S. 978, 98 S.Ct. 600, 54 L.Ed.2d 472 (1977); Planned Parenthood of Minnesota, Inc. v. Citizens for Community Action, 558 F. 2d 861, 866 (8th Cir. 1977); American Train Dispatchers v. Burlington Northern, 551 F. 2d 749, 751 (8th Cir. 1977); Missouri Portlan…
  • …r federal courts have entertained the question for a number of years. Initially, Federal Courts of Appeals held that the NCAA was a state actor for §1983 purposes. E. g., Regents of University of Minnesota v. NCAA, 560 F. 2d 352 (CA8), cert. dism’d, 434 U. S. 978 (1977); Howard University v. NCAA, 166 U. S. App. D. C. 260, 510 F. 2d 213 (1975); Parish v. NCAA, 506 F. 2d 1028 (CA5 1975); Associated Students, Inc. v. NCAA, 493 F. 2d 1251 (CA9 1974) (per curiam). Since our decisions in Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co…

Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw