OGLETREE ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES; AND SCOTT ET AL. V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (57 total)

• Gulf OIL Co. v. Bernard, 452 U.S. 89 (U.S. 1981)
  …ses being addressed— should result in a carefully drawn order that limits speech as little as possible, consistent with the rights of the parties under the circumstances. As the court stated in Coles v. Marsh, 560 F. 2d 186, 189 (CA3), cert. denied, 434 U. S. 985 (1977): “[T]o the extent that the district court is empowered . . . to restrict certain communications in order to prevent frustration of the policies of Rule 23, it may not exercise the power without a specific record showing by the moving party o…
• United States v. Michel, 588 F.2d 986 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …roles than others or because certain members performed only a single function. United States v. Becker, supra. Neither does it become several plans because of internal personnel changes. United States v. Scott, 555 F. 2d 522 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 434 U.S. 985, 98 S.Ct. 610, 54 L.Ed.2d 478 (1977). The government’s substantial proof of overlapping membership and activities directed toward a common goal is sufficient to support the jury verdict reflecting a single conspiracy. United States v. Scott, supra…
• Coke v. Gen. Adjustment Bureau, Inc., 640 F.2d 584 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …m the EEOC, 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e-5(f)(1) (1974). See Genovese v. Shell Oil Co., 488 F. 2d 84 (5th Cir. 1973); Wrenn v. American Cast Iron Pipe [*593] Co., 575 F. 2d 544 (5th Cir. 1978). See also Eastland v. TVA, 553 F. 2d 364 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 434 U.S. 985, 98 S.Ct. 611, 54 L.Ed.2d 479 (1977) (30-day period for filing suit by an aggrieved federal employee against his employer under 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e-16(c) (1974) is a jurisdictional requirement). However, none of these cases addressed the issue of w…