FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
v.
HOME BOX OFFICE, INC., ET AL.; NASHVILLE GAS CO. V. TENNESSEE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ET AL.; BERNSTEIN V. FLORIDA ET AL.; AND BROPHY V. NEW HAMPSHIRE ET AL.; ERNEST V. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT; JACKSON V. JAGO, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT; EVERS V. UNITED STATES; RUST V. NEBRASKA; AND HOLTAN V. NEBRASKA
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
HOME BOX OFFICE, INC., ET AL.; NASHVILLE GAS CO. V. TENNESSEE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ET AL.; BERNSTEIN V. FLORIDA ET AL.; AND BROPHY V. NEW HAMPSHIRE ET AL.; ERNEST V. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT; JACKSON V. JAGO, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT; EVERS V. UNITED STATES; RUST V. NEBRASKA; AND HOLTAN V. NEBRASKA
434 U.S. 988
Supreme Court of the United States (1977)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Pino, 606 F.2d 908 (10th Cir. 1979)…s that the delay of some four months before the doctor’s examination of defendant renders the testimony inadmissible. Such factors generally go to the weight of the testimony, see United States v. Taylor, 562 F. 2d 572, 575 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 988, 98 S.Ct. 620, 54 L.Ed.2d 484, but they may be considered by the trial court in determining the sufficiency of the scientific basis for the testimony.…
-
United States v. Mitchell, 725 F.2d 832 (2d Cir. 1983)…ility and the appropriate conditions for holding a person morally blameworthy. Some view duress as precluding the mens rea required for criminal culpability. See People v. Condley, 69 Cal.App.3d 999, 1011-12, 138 Cal.Rptr. 515, 521-22, cert. denied, 434 U.S. 988, 98 S.Ct. 619, 54 L.Ed.2d 483 (1977); Perkins, The Doctrine of Coercion, 19 Iowa L.Rev. 507 n. 1 (1934).3 However, others contend that duress does not preclude a finding of the voluntariness required for criminal responsibility because the defendant…
-
Smith v. The Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. & The Budd Co., 755 F.2d 129 (8th Cir. 1985)…he OSHA servicing standard, and that fact was pertinent to the issue of a safe design alternative. Questions of relevancy are committed to the broad discretion of the trial court, United States v. Taylor, 562 F. 2d 572, 575 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 988, 98 S.Ct. 620, 54 L.Ed.2d 484 (1977), and under the particular facts of this case we see no reason to overturn the trial court’s assessment of relevancy with respect to the OSHA standards. Appellants also argue that even if the standards were relev…