HOOBAN

v.

BOARD OF GOVERNORS, WASHINGTON STATE BAR ASSN.

Citator

Cited By

• Gutierrez v. Bertram S. Griggs, 695 F.2d 1195 (9th Cir. 1983)
  …a valid duress defense would his due process claim have any merit. Under California law, the defense of duress requires that the threat to life be imminent and immediate. People v. Condley, 69 Cal.App.3d 999, 1012, 138 Cal.Rptr. 515, cert. denied, 434 U.S. 988, 98 S.Ct. 619, 54 L.Ed.2d 483 (1977). Gutierrez does not attack this standard. Indeed, we have followed essentially the same standard in federal eases in this circuit. See United States v. Michelson, 559 F. 2d 567, 569 (9th Cir.1977); United States…
• AIR Transp. Ass'n OF Am. v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., 732 F.2d 219 (D.C. Cir. 1984)
  …the public in a concrete and focused form so as to make criticism or formulation of alternatives possible.” Home Box Office, Inc. v. FCC, 567 F. 2d 9, 36 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 829, 98 S.Ct. 111, 54 L.Ed.2d 89, petition for reh’g denied, 434 U.S. 988, 98 S.Ct. 621, 54 L.Ed.2d 484 (1977). Finally, petitioner contends that the rule should be invalidated because the Board lacked good cause to make the filing fee schedule effective four days after publication. See 5 U.S.C. § 553(d) (publication of…
• Lucero v. Ogden, 718 F.2d 355 (10th Cir. 1983)
  …ies the procedural due process requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment. See also: Newsome v. Dominique, 455 F.Supp. 1373 (E.D.Mo.1978); Hooban v. Board of Governors of Washington State Bar Assoc., 85 Wash.2d 774, 539 P. 2d 686 (1975), reh’g denied, 434 U.S. 988, 98 S.Ct. 622, 54 L.Ed.2d 485 (1977); Petition of Pacheco, 85 N.M. 600, 514 P. 2d 1297 (1973); Petition of Wayland, 510 P. 2d 1385 (Okla.1971); Feldman v. State Board of Law Examiners, 438 F. 2d 699 (8th Cir.1971); In re Monaghan, 126 Vt. 193,225 A.…