HAAS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• GTE Sylvania, Inc. v. Consumers Union of the United States, Inc., 445 U.S. 375 (U.S. 1980)
  …ated the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, and remanded the case “for further consideration in light of the permanent injunction” entered in Delaware. GTE Sylvania, Inc. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc., 434 U. S. 1030 (1978). On remand, the Court of Appeals reaffirmed its holding that there was a case .or controversy within the.meaning of. Art. III.7 Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. Consumer Product Safety Comm’n, 192 U. S. App. D. C. 93, 100, 590 F.…
• United States Steel Corp. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 595 F.2d 207 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …judicial error.” Although the judicial review provisions of the APA have been held not strictly applicable to direct review in the courts of appeals, Natural Resources Defense Council v. NRC, 539 F. 2d 824, 837 (CA2, 1976), vacated on other grounds, 434 U.S. 1030, 98 S.Ct. 760, 54 L.Ed.2d 777 (1978), we nevertheless find this principle applicable. . There is no need for the AAPCC to reconsider its initial designation list, since we see no indication of procedural error on its part. We reject petitioner Repu…
• Terence D. Hughey v. JMS Dev. Corp., 78 F.3d 1523 (11th Cir. 1996)
  …nforcement proceedings in spite of [the complete unavailability of an NPDES permit], or society must tolerate slippage of an interim pollution abatement deadline. Republic Steel Corp. v. Train, 557 F. 2d 91, 94 (6th Cir.1977), vacated and remanded, 434 U.S. 1030, 98 S.Ct. 761, 54 L.Ed.2d 778 (1978). Balancing these concerns on the basis of the record before us, we refuse to place the burden on JMS. The orders imposing statutory penalties and attorney fees and costs were premised on the finding that JMS wa…