CITY OF HARTFORD ET AL.

v.

TOWN OF GLASTONBURY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (116 total)

• Pullman-Standard v. Swint, 456 U.S. 273 (U.S. 1982)
  …ntent, and the extent to which the court below adhered to that procedure in this case. The District Court examined the four factors approved by the Fifth Circuit in James v. Stockham Valves & Fittings [*298] Co., 559 F. 2d 310 (1977), cert. denied, 434 U. S. 1034 (1978), to determine whether the departmental seniority system at Pullman-Standard was adopted or maintained for a discriminatory purpose. Although indicating that these four factors are not the only way to demonstrate the existence of discriminator…
• Clauson v. Smith, 823 F.2d 660 (1st Cir. 1987)
  …r her unseaworthy. E.g., Morales v. City of Galveston, 370 U.S. 165, 170-71, 82 S.Ct. 1226, 1229-30, 8 L.Ed.2d 412 (1962); Edynak v. Atlantic Shipping Inc. Cie. Chambon Maclovia S.A., 562 [*666] F. 2d 215, 224-25 & n. 13 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034, 98 S.Ct. 767, 54 L.Ed.2d 781 (1978).5 We need not ponder whether either of these neoteric theories— too few in crew, use of an improper method — find meaningful support in the record. Assuming them to be legally cognizable, the plain fact of the ma…
• Griffin v. Carlin, 755 F.2d 1516 (11th Cir. 1985)
  …ate impact analysis, the district court pointed out that many of this Court’s decisions examine the classwide impact of a subjective promotional system. See, e.g., James v. Stockham Valves & Fittings Co., 559 F. 2d 310 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1034, 98 S.Ct. 767, 54 L.Ed.2d 781 (1978); Rowe v. General Motors Corp., 457 F. 2d 348 (5th Cir. 1972). We agree with the district court’s assessment that the subjective promotional system in this case indeed may have had a classwide impact. Thus, we exa…