ADAMS
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA
ADAMS
SOUTH CAROLINA
434 U.S. 1036
Supreme Court of the United States (1978)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Desert Palace, Inc. v. Local Joint Executive Bd. OF LAS Vegas, 679 F.2d 789 (9th Cir. 1982)…, an award that exceeds the monetary loss which an injured party suffered as a result of a contract breach is considered punitive. Westinghouse Electric Corp., Aerospace Division v. IBEW Local 1805, 561 F. 2d 521, 523-4 (4th Cir. 1977), cert. denied 434 U.S. 1036, 98 S.Ct. 771, 54 L.Ed.2d 783 (1978). The district court assumed that for an award to be compensatory it must be limited to the tips the servers lost as a result of the Hotel’s change to the Ticketron system. This is incorrect. The arbitrator did…
-
United Elec. v. Litton Microwave Cooking Prods., 704 F.2d 393 (8th Cir. 1983)…We concur in the district court’s analysis. This case is very similar factually to Westinghouse Electric Corp., Aerospace Division v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 1805, 561 F. 2d 521 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1036, 98 S.Ct. 771, 54 L.Ed.2d 783 (1978), one of the cases relied on by the district court. In Westinghouse the Fourth Circuit affirmed the arbitrator’s finding that the employer had violated the collective bargaining agreement by allowing insufficient…