ALFRED LANDI AND MILDRED MAINIERI, APPELLANTS,
v.
MAX ENGELMAN AND ABRAHAM ENGELMAN, CO-PARTNERS DOING BUSINESS AS ENGELMAN & CO., APPELLEES
ALFRED LANDI AND MILDRED MAINIERI, APPELLANTS,
MAX ENGELMAN AND ABRAHAM ENGELMAN, CO-PARTNERS DOING BUSINESS AS ENGELMAN & CO., APPELLEES
205 So. 2d 687
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1967)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed on the authority of Alberts v. Schneiderman, Fla.App.1966, 182 So.2d 50; Buttles v. Smith, 281 N.Y. 226, 22 N.E.2d 350 (1939); Buckley v. Stansfield, 214 N. Y. 679, 108 N.E. 1090 (1915); Darcey v. Brooklyn and N. Y. Ferry Co., 196 N.Y. 99, 89 N.E. 461, 26 L.R.A.,N.S., 267 (1909), and Bugeja v. Davis, 34 Misc.2d 276, 228 N.Y.S.2d 216 (1962).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State Rd. Dep't of Fla. v. Brenner, 208 So. 2d 279 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967)…not only to attorneys’ fees in the appellate Court, but that such fees “must be assessed by that court” (meaning this Court). However, we have recently held in Campus University Apts., Inc. v. Audlane Lumber & Builders Supply, Inc., Fla.App. 1968, 205 So. 2d 687, that there is no authority for filing of petition for rehearing in this Court to further consider a previous order dismissing an appeal. The rationale of the Campus University case is that petitions for rehearing are allowable in the appellate Cour…
Authorities Cited
- Alberts v. Schneiderman, 182 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)