PATTERSON ET AL.

v.

ARKANSAS

Citator

Cited By (34 total)

• Jacksonville Shipyards, Inc. v. Oswego Petroleum Carriers, Inc., 443 So. 2d 349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
  …agreement explicitly provides otherwise. See E. C. Ernst Inc. v. Manhattan Construction Co. of Texas, 551 F. 2d 1026 rehearing denied in part, granted in part, 559 F. 2d 268 (5th CCA 1977), cert. denied, Provident Hospital v. Manhattan Construction, 434 U.S. 1067, 98 S.Ct. 1246, 55 L.Ed.2d 769 (1978). In the present case the express indemnity provision of the “Red Letter” clause is a suffi [*351] cient predicate for an award of attorney’s fees and costs, and the contract does not otherwise negate the applica…
• Anderson v. Charles, 447 U.S. 404 (U.S. 1980)
  …at all. See United States v. Agee, 597 F. 2d 350, 354-356 (CA3) (en banc), cert. denied, 442 U. S. 944 (1979); United States v. Mireles, 570 P. 2d 1287, 1291-1293 (CA5 1978); United States v. Goldman, 563 F. 2d 501, 503-504 (CA1 1977), cert. denied, 434 U. S. 1067 (1978). In this case, the Court of Appeals recognized that the respondent could be questioned about prior statements inconsistent with his trial testimony. The court therefore approved the “latter portion of the above quoted cross-examination. . .…
• United States v. Flaherty, 668 F.2d 566 (1st Cir. 1981)
  …argument not improper, we have found that the comment was “sufficiently circumscribed and did not necessarily implicate appellant’s assertion of his fifth amendment right.” United States v. Goldman, 563 F. 2d 501, 505 (1st Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1067, 98 S.Ct. 1245, 55 L.Ed.2d 768 (1978); United States v. Hooker, 541 F. 2d 300, 307 (1st Cir. 1976). In both those cases, the prosecutor commented on the failure to impeach a Government witness during cross-examination. In another case, we balanced…