JACEK

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Ira Nash, Jr. v. Estelle, 597 F.2d 513 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …F. 2d 202, 205 (CA6, 1978); U. S. v. DiGiacomo, 579 F. 2d 1211, 1215 (CA10, 1978); Pierce v. Cardwell, 572 F. 2d 1339 (CA9, 1978); White v. Finkbeiner, 570 F. 2d 194, 201-02 (CA7, 1978); U. S. v. Charlton, 565 F. 2d 86, 91 (CA6, 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1070, 98 S.Ct. 1253, 55 L.Ed. 2d 773 (1978); U. S. v. Wyatt, 561 F. 2d 1388, 1390 (CA4, 1977); U. S. v. Johnson, 529 F. 2d 581, 584 (CA8), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 909, 96 S.Ct. 2233, 48 L.Ed.2d 835 (1976). The government bears this heavy burden of provi…
• Bennett v. Tucker, 827 F.2d 63 (7th Cir. 1987)
  …982). In this case, the district court focused on the inconvenience to the defendant. However, laches requires more than just inconvenience. See Helene Curtis Industries v. Church & Dwight Company, 560 F. 2d 1325, 1334 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1070, 98 S.Ct. 1252, 55 L.Ed.2d 772 (1978). The crucial inquiry in this case is whether the defendant reasonably could have construed the plaintiffs’ delay to mean that the plaintiffs were not going to file suit. Given the pendency of Logan v. Zimmerman…
• The Coca-Cola Co. v. Overland, Inc., 692 F.2d 1250 (9th Cir. 1982)
  …gnificance of the word to the public becomes the indication of the nature or class of an article, rather than the indication of the article’s origin. Helene Curtis Industries v. Church & Dwight Co., 560 F. 2d 1325, 1332 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1070, 98 S.Ct. 1252, 55 L.Ed.2d 772 (1978). . In addition to the presumption of non-genericness flowing from the fact of registration, Coca-Cola also cites numerous cases finding that “Coke” is a non-generic trademark in support of its motion for summar…