HALL

v.

WAINWRIGHT, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF OFFENDER REHABILITATION OF FLORIDA

Citator

Cited By

• Davis v. State OF Ala., 596 F.2d 1214 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …; Thomas v. Estelle, 588 F. 2d 170, 171 (5th Cir. 1979); Buckelew v. United States, 575 F. 2d 515, 521 (5th Cir. 1978); Pennington v. Beto, 437 F. 2d 1281, 1285 (5th Cir. 1971). See also Sand v. Estelle, 551 F. 2d 49 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1076, 98 S.Ct. 1267, 55 L.Ed.2d 783 (1978); Cheely v. United States, 535 F. 2d 934, 936 (5th Cir. 1976). All of these cases involved an attorney’s failure to conduct an adequate investigation of possible defenses, and we believe this is decisive. Not e…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Sherlock, 962 F.2d 1349 (9th Cir. 1989)
  …ts essential to the fair administration of justice. Waller, 467 U.S. at 45, 104 S.Ct. at 2214; United States v. Hernandez, 608 F. 2d 741, 747 (9th Cir.1979); United States ex rel. Latimore v. Sielaff, 561 F. 2d 691, 694 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1076, 98 S.Ct. 1266, 55 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978). Federal courts have recognized limitations on that right where a judge has excluded spectators during a witness’s testimony for a justifiable purpose. See Hernandez, 608 F. 2d at 747-48 (to protect witness fro…
• United States v. Hubbard, 650 F.2d 293 (D.C. Cir. 1980)
  …; Annot. 62 ALR 2d 509, 510-29 (1958). See also Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Va., 448 U.S. at 600 n.5, 100 S.Ct. at 2821 (Stewart, J. concurring). . E. g., United States ex rel. Latimore v. Sielaff, 561 F. 2d 691, 693 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1076, 98 S.Ct. 1266, 55 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978) (excluding the merely curious from the testimony of a rape victim); Harris v. Stephens, 361 F. 2d 888, 891 (8th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 964, 87 S.Ct. 1040, 18 L.Ed.2d 113 (1967) (“frequent and accepte…