JOHNSTON ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Gribble v. Harris, 625 F.2d 1173 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …ry of the judgment appealed from. Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1). The delay period for appeal is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Illinois Department of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 561, 54 L.Ed.2d 521, rehearing denied, 434 U.S. 1089, 98 S.Ct. 1286, 55 L.Ed.2d 795 (1978); Edwards v. Joyner, 566 F. 2d 960, 961 (5th Cir. 1978). It is, however, tolled by the timely filing of a motion pursuant to Rule 52(b) (to amend or make additional findings of fact and to amend the judgment ac…
• Dunn v. The State OF Tenn., 697 F.2d 121 (6th Cir. 1982)
  …atute of limitations in question begins to run at the time of the termination of the state proceeding. This Court, in Kurz v. State of Michigan, 548 F. 2d 172, 174 (6th Cir.1977), cert. denied 434 U.S. 972, 98 S.Ct. 526, 54 L.Ed.2d 462 reh’g denied 434 U.S. 1089, 98 S.Ct. 1289, 55 L.Ed.2d 796 (1978), questioned the dismissal of a 1983 malicious prosecution claim for untimeliness. The Court recognized that under state law the action accrued on the date the Michigan Supreme Court dismissed the underlying crim…
• Mabra Huff v. Int'l Longshoremen's Ass'n, 799 F.2d 1087 (5th Cir. 1986)
  ….App.P. 4(a)(1); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2107 (1982). The time limitation imposed by rule 4(a) is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections of Illinois, 434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 560, 54 L.Ed.2d 521, reh’g denied, 434 U.S. 1089, 98 S.Ct. 1286, 55 L.Ed.2d 795 (1978); United States v. Montgomery, 778 F. 2d 222, 224 (5th Cir.1985); Pryor v. U.S. Postal Service, 769 F. 2d 281, 284 (5th Cir.1985). The thirty-day notice period of rule 4(a)(1) runs from the date the judgment or o…

  ← 1 / 2 →