MOBIL ALASKA PIPELINE CO.

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.; EXXON PIPELINE CO. V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; BP PIPELINES, INC. V. UNITED STATES ET AL; AND ARCO PIPE LINE CO. V. UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Grp. Life & Health Ins. Co. v. Royal Drug Co., Inc., 440 U.S. 205 (U.S. 1979)
  …ning of §2 (b), the appellate court did not reach the other questions decided by the trial court. 556 F. 2d 1375. We granted certiorari because of intercircuit conflicts as to the meaning of the phrase “business of insurance” in § 2 (b) of the Act.2 435 U. S. 903. [*209] I Blue Shield offers insurance policies which entitle the policyholders to obtain prescription drugs. If the pharmacy selected by the insured has entered into a “Pharmacy Agreement” with Blue Shield, and is therefore a participating pharmac…
• Washington v. Confederated Bands and Tribes of the Yakima Indian Nation, 439 U.S. 463 (U.S. 1979)
  …ting probable jurisdiction of the appeal, we requested the parties to address the issue whether the partial geographic and subject-matter jurisdiction ordained by Chapter 36 is authorized by federal law, as well as the Equal Protection Clause issue. 435 U. S. 903:5 [*469] I The Confederated Bands and Tribes of the Yakima Indian Nation comprise 14 originally distinct Indian tribes that joined together in the middle of the 19th century for purposes of their relationships with the United States. A treaty was s…

  ← 1 / 2 →