IRANIAN SHIPPING LINES, S. A.

v.

ARYA SHIPPING LINES, S. A., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (95 total)

• Herman v. State, 396 So. 2d 222 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)
  …lliams v. State, 73 Fla. 1198, 75 So. 785 (1917); United States v. Gandolfo, 577 F. 2d 955 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 933, 99 S.Ct. 2056, 60 L.Ed.2d 662 (1979); United States v. Robinson, 560 F. 2d 507, 509 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905, 98 S.Ct. 1451, 55 L.Ed.2d 496 (1978). The expert’s testimony that he could not say one way or the other whether the shotgun admitted was the murder weapon, was not conclusive or binding on the jury which was free to determine credibility and weight…
• United States v. Giese, 597 F.2d 1170 (9th Cir. 1979)
  …n in determining what evidence should be received. In both instances, he must balance probative value on the one hand and degree of prejudice on [*1193] the other. United States v. Robinson, 560 F. 2d 507, 515 (2d Cir. 1977) (en banc), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905, 98 S.Ct. 1451, 55 L.Ed.2d 496 (1978), held that “the preferable rule” in reviewing a district court’s decision on the question of unfair prejudice “is to uphold the trial judge’s exercise of discretion unless he acts arbitrarily or irrationally.” T…
• United States v. Carson, 702 F.2d 351 (2d Cir. 1983)
  …g on the admissibility of relevant evidence: “the preferable rule is to uphold the trial judge’s exercise of discretion unless he acts arbitrarily or irrationally.” United States v. Robinson, 560 F. 2d 507, 515 (2d Cir.1977) (en banc), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905, 98 S.Ct. 1451, 55 L.Ed.2d 496 (1978). There has been no showing that the trial judge was either arbitrary or irrational in balancing the probative value of this evidence against its prejudicial effect. Quite the contrary. Even if we assume that t…