MORRISON

v.

REED, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION OF NORTH CAROLINA

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Orson G. White, 648 F.2d 29 (D.C. Cir. 1981)
  …of force and intrusion in an “investigatory stop” may be legitimately esealated to meet supervening events, such as attempted flight, e. g., United States v. Thompson, 558 F. 2d 522, 524 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied sub nom. Reeve v. United States, 435 U.S. 914, 98 S.Ct. 1466, 55 L.Ed.2d 504 (1978) (drawing of weapon justified after officers had identified themselves and ordered the vans to stop and one van started to move, then lurched forward); United States v. Maslanka, 501 F. 2d 208, 213 (5th Cir. 1974…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Robertson, 833 F.2d 777 (9th Cir. 1987)
  …at with motor running at scene of arrest of other defendant); Bautista, 684 F. 2d at 1289 (defendant kept pacing, turning head, “as if he was thinking about running”). See United States v. Thompson, 558 F. 2d 522, 524 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 914, 98 S.Ct. 1466, 55 L.Ed.2d 504 (1978). Accordingly, the purpose of the asserted “Terry stop”— to allow the officers to investigate without fear of flight or violence, see Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143, 92 S.Ct. 1921, 32 L.Ed.2d 612 (1972)—was not…
• LaROUCHE v. Fed. Bureau OF Investigation, 677 F.2d 256 (2d Cir. 1982)
  …ies. Stallworth v. Monsanto Co., 558 F. 2d 257, 265 (5th Cir. 1977). Intervention will neither interfere with the orderly processes of the court, United States v. Allegheny-Ludlum Industries, Inc., 553 F. 2d 451, 453 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 914, 98 S.Ct. 1467, 55 L.Ed.2d 505 (1978), nor prejudice the rights of the parties. McDonald v. Lavino Co., 430 F. 2d 1065, 1074 (5th Cir. 1970). Because little progress has been made in the under [*258] lying action, intervention will not necessitate…