MOORER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (29 total)

• Furtado v. Bishop, 604 F.2d 80 (1st Cir. 1979)
  …dence (for example, because he was offered a continuance, did not request a continuance, or had the statement in advance). E. g., United States v. Bailey, supra, 581 F. 2d at 348; United States v. Lyon, 567 F. 2d 777, 784 (8th Cir.), cert, denied, 435 U.S. 918, 98 S.Ct. 1476, 55 L.Ed.2d 510 (1977); United States v. Medico, supra, 557 F. 2d at 316 n.7; United States v. Carlson, supra, 547 F. 2d at 1355; United States v. Leslie, 542 F. 2d 285, 291 (5th Cir. 1976); United States v. Iaconetti, 540 F. 2d 574,…
• United States v. Viserto, 596 F.2d 531 (2d Cir. 1979)
  …he earlier prosecution, because the earlier acquittal of the income tax violation did not “necessarily” determine that the cash used was not derived from the narcotics business. United States v. King, 563 F. 2d 559, 561 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 918, 98 S.Ct. 1476, 55 L.Ed.2d 510 (1978); United States v. Cala, 521 F. 2d 605, 608 (2d Cir. 1975). Appellants contend further that, since Solee had previously been acquitted of income-tax evasion, allegedly on the theory that the cash expenditures we…
• DeLONG Corp. v. Raymond Int'l, Inc., 622 F.2d 1135 (3d Cir. 1980)
  …rovision of 35 U.S.C. § 102(b). It is true, as DeLong asserts that “[t]he invention must be completed before sales efforts become a bar [to its patentability].” Austin v. Marco Dental Products, Inc., 560 F. 2d 966, 969 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 918, 98 S.Ct. 1477, 55 L.Ed.2d 511 (1978). Its position is that the invention is incomplete until it has been reduced to practice. A reduction to practice “is not achieved until the inventor has sufficiently tested the prototype to prove its utility an…