FORGE ET AL.

v.

MINNESOTA

Citator

Cited By

• Culver v. Slater Boat Co., 644 F.2d 460 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …okout and its allowing the vessel to drift were substantial causes of Culver’s ultimate injury; therefore, EPFs negligence was active. See Chesapeake & Ohio Railway v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad, 564 F. 2d 222, 224 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 919, 98 S.Ct. 1515, 55 L.Ed.2d 535 (1978). Likewise, ODECO’s use of an anchor line that was too short and the failure to maintain its buoy amounted to active negligence. Gulf’s claim that it was only passively negligent requires more extended discuss…
• Peyote WAY Church OF GOD, Inc. v. Thornburgh, 922 F.2d 1210 (5th Cir. 1991)
  …mption. Peyote Way, not being a tribal Native American organization, is not the proper plaintiff to raise this claim. Accord State v. Forge, 262 N.W. 2d 341, 345 n. 10 (Minn.1977) (en banc), appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question, 435 U.S. 919, 98 S.Ct. 1479, 55 L.Ed.2d 512 (1978). . The only major source of peyote in this country is in South Texas. Although Peyote Way's solitary place of worship is in Arizona, its members, like all others who require more than a few peyote buttons a yea…
• Herceg v. Hustler Magazine, Inc., 814 F.2d 1017 (5th Cir. 1987)
  …728 F. 2d 528, 532 n. 6 (D.C.Cir.1984) (citing Kassman v. American University, 546 F. 2d 1029, 1032 (D.C.Cir.1976) (per curiam)); Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Co., 564 F. 2d 222, 226 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 919, 98 S.Ct. 1515, 55 L.Ed.2d 535 (1978); Santa Clara Valley Distributing v. Pabst Brewing Co., 556 F. 2d 942, 946 (9th Cir.1977). . See, e.g., Mack v. Newton, 737 F. 2d 1343, 1350 (5th Cir.1984); Gross v. Black and Decker (U.S.), Inc., 695 F. 2d 858…