JOE

v.

VIRGINIA

Citator

Cited By (68 total)

• State v. Boyce E. Glosson, 462 So. 2d 1082 (Fla. 1985)
  …nmental misconduct is an objective question of law for the trial court, as opposed to the subjective predisposition question submitted to the jury in the usual entrapment defense. United States v. Graves, 556 F. 2d 1319 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 923, 98 S.Ct. 1485, 55 L.Ed.2d 516 (1978); United States v. Quinn, 543 F. 2d 640 (8th Cir.1976). The trial court had sufficient undisputed facts in the stipulation to determine as a matter of law that Wilson’s contingent fee arrangement with the sherif…
• Dearth v. State, 390 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)
  …; People v. Peterson, 62 Mich.App. 258, 233 N.W. 2d 250 (1975). Cf. Roman v. State, 570 P. 2d 1235 (Alaska 1977); United States v. Consuelo-Gonzalez, 521 F. 2d 259 (9th Cir. 1975); United States v. Pierce, 561 F. 2d 735 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied 435 U.S. 923, 98 S.Ct. 1486, 55 L.Ed.2d 516 (1978); United States ex rel. Coleman v. Smith, 395 F.Supp. 1155 (W.D.N.Y.1975); Diaz v. Ward, 437 F.Supp. 678 (S.D.N.Y.1977). . See People v. Mason, supra; Seim v. State, 590 P. 2d 1152 (Nev.1979); Huffman v. United…
• Krajewski v. State, 587 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)
  …forcement agencies in conducting the war against crime. Whether a particular practice constitutes deprivation of due process is ordinarily a matter of law for the court to decide. United States v. Graves, 556 F. 2d 1319 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 923, 98 S.Ct. 1485, 55 L.Ed.2d 516 (1978). Appellant presents such a due process argument here. In State v. Glosson, 462 So. 2d 1082 (Fla.1985), our supreme court established some parameters for consideration of the due process defense in the context o…