LUNSFORD

v.

INVESTORS DIVERSIFIED SERVICES, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (36 total)

• Hazelwood Sch. Dist. v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (U.S. 1988)
  …ntitled to substantial deference. See, e. g., Nicholson v. Board of Education, Torrance Unified School Dist., 682 F. 2d 858 (CA9 1982); Seyfried v. Wal [*274] ton, 668 F. 2d 214 (CA3 1981); Trachtman v. Anker, 563 F. 2d 512 (CA2 1977), cert. denied, 435 U. S. 925 (1978); Frasca v. Andrews, 463 F. Supp. 1043 (EDNY 1979). We need not now decide whether the same degree of deference is appropriate with respect to school-sponsored expressive activities at the college and university level. The reasonableness of P…
• Reno v. Koray, 515 U.S. 50 (U.S. 1995)
  …2d 727, 730 (CA5 1974) (time spent on “highly restricted bond” not creditable as “‘custody’”); United States v. Robles, 563 F. 2d 1308, 1309 (CA9 1977) (“[T]ime spent on bail or on bond pending appeal is not time served ‘in custody’”), cert. denied, 435 U. S. 925 (1978); Ortega v. United States, 510 F. 2d 412, 413 (CA10 1975) (“‘custody’” refers to “actual custodial incarceration,” not “the time a criminal defendant is free on bond”); United States v. Peterson, 507 F. 2d 1191, 1192 (CADC 1974) (“ ‘in custody…
• Marbury Mgmt., Inc. v. Kohn, 629 F.2d 705 (2d Cir. 1980)
  …uctant expressly to adopt this language. See, e. g., Moody v. Bache & Co., Inc., 570 F. 2d 523, 527 n.7 (5th Cir. 1978); St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc., 562 F. 2d 1040, 1048 mil (8th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 925, 98 S.Ct. 1490, 55 L.Ed.2d 519 (1978). . The standard of causation espoused here is ° also implicit in the manner of calculating damages in cases successfully prosecuted under Section 10(b). Generally, plaintiffs will be awarded the difference be…