BAKER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (47 total)

• Scott v. State, 629 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)
  …e think the stops of all persons found on a likely access route to [or from] the scene of the crime was reasonable, both in its purpose and in the manner it was conducted. See United States v. Constantine, 567 F. 2d 266 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 926, 98 S.Ct. 1492, 55 L.Ed.2d 520 (1978); United States v. Jackson, 448 F. 2d 963 (9th Cir.1971). Accord, e.g., United States v. O’Mara, 963 F. 2d 1288 (9th Cir.1992); Perry v. State, 422 So. 2d 957 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); 3 Wayne R. LaFave, Search & Seiz…
• United States v. Lippner, 676 F.2d 456 (11th Cir. 1982)
  …vision. The question of what constitutes a “final” conviction for the purposes of the enhanced sentencing provisions has been the subject of two recent cases in other circuits. In United States v. Allen, 566 F. 2d 1193 (3d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 926, 98 S.Ct. 1491, 55 L.Ed.2d 519 (1978), the Third Circuit faced the exact issue presented here and held that a conviction pending appeal was not final for the purposes of enhanced sentencing. The court noted that the predecessor recidivist statute us…
• United States v. Lewis, 621 F.2d 1382 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …he beeper were never activated. There arguably is a right to enjoy the use of goods without the possibility of uninvited monitoring that an unactivated beeper would create. But cf. United States v. Moore, 562 F. 2d 106 (1st Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 926, 98 S.Ct. 1493, 55 L.Ed.2d 521 (dictum; by itself, placement of beeper on underbody of van is too minimal a trespass to constitute Fourth Amendment violation). However, there is no possibility of uninvited monitoring, and therefore no privacy intere…

  ← 1 / 2 →