EXUM

v.

PERINI, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• United States v. Kopituk, 690 F.2d 1289 (11th Cir. 1982)
  …the relevance of evidence are well within the broad discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed on appeal absent a showing that the trial court abused its discretion. Williams v. Hoyt, 556 F. 2d 1336, 1339 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 946, 98 S.Ct. 1530, 55 L.Ed.2d 544 (1978); United States [*1320] v. Linetsky, 538 F. 2d 192, 204 (5th Cir. 1976); United States v. Calles, 482 F. 2d 1155, 1160 (5th Cir. 1973); United States v. Allison, 474 F. 2d 286, 288-289 (5th Cir. 1973). The trial…
• United States v. Orson G. White, 648 F.2d 29 (D.C. Cir. 1981)
  …75) (the appellants had loaded a rifle on their plane; the agents drew their weapons only when the appellant would not shut off the engine of the plane as it was about to take off); United States v. Bull, 565 F. 2d 869 (4th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 946, 98 S.Ct. 1531, 55 L.Ed.2d 545 (1978) (one of the parties wore a jacket on a warm summer night, alerting the officer to the possibility of a concealed weapon); United States v. Maslanka, 501 F. 2d 208, 213 n.6 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S.…

  ← 1 / 4 →
• United States v. Ocampo, 890 F.2d 1363 (7th Cir. 1989)
  …ch of the police are all facts which bear on the issue of reasonableness. United States v. Serna-Barreto, 842 F. 2d at 967; United States v. Harley, 682 F. 2d 398 (2d Cir.1982); United States v. Bull, 565 F. 2d 869, 870 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 946, 98 S.Ct. 1531, 55 L.Ed.2d 545 (1978). We recognize that Officer Dailey’s show of force was highly intrusive and under some circumstances would certainly be tantamount to an arrest. Here, however, the officer, a fifteen year drug enforcement vetera…