BRAND
v.
UNITED STATES; PHILLIPS PETROLEUM CO. V. SHUTTS, EXECUTOR, ET AL.; DAPPOLONIA V. BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS OF FLORIDA, AND MURRY V. UNITED STATES
BRAND
UNITED STATES; PHILLIPS PETROLEUM CO. V. SHUTTS, EXECUTOR, ET AL.; DAPPOLONIA V. BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS OF FLORIDA, AND MURRY V. UNITED STATES
435 U.S. 961
Supreme Court of the United States (1978)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Solomon, 686 F.2d 863 (11th Cir. 1982)…ard of review is to balance the government’s legitimate interests in delay against the resulting prejudice. United States v. Brand, 5 Cir. 1977, 556 F. 2d 1312, 1317 n.7, cert. denied, 1978, 434 U.S. 1063, 98 S.Ct. 1237, 55 L.Ed.2d 763; reh. denied, 435 U.S. 961, 98 S.Ct. 1593, 55 L.Ed.2d 811. The standard is a high one. The defendant has cited no case, and we have found none in this circuit, in which it was met. To make a showing of prejudice, Sokolow argues that while the government was delaying an indic…