STILLMAN

v.

UNITED STATES; BRYANT V. UNITED STATES; PERRY V. UNITED STATES; CAMPBELL V. UNITED STATES; AND SMITH V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Whitten, 706 F.2d 1000 (9th Cir. 1983)
  …e to meet the test of Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108, 84 S.Ct. 1509, 12 L.Ed.2d 723 (1964). That information was detailed, however, and was corroborated by police investigation. United States v. Moreno, 569 F. 2d 1049, 1052 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 972, 98 S.Ct. 1615, 56 L.Ed.2d 64 (1978). The trial court’s finding of probable cause is amply supported. Gaiefsky also argues that his arrest violated the rule of Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573, 100 S.Ct. 1371, 63 L.Ed.2d 639 (1980), barring warrantl…
• United States v. Buenaventura Martinez, 763 F.2d 1297 (11th Cir. 1985)
  …jury to view the MAR AZUL. A decision regarding jury viewing is within the trial court’s sound discretion and can be grounds for reversal only if that discretion is abused. United States v. Bryant, 563 F. 2d 1227, 1230 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 972, 98 S.Ct. 1616, 56 L.Ed.2d 65 (1978). We find the district court’s decision to be well within its discretion, especially since appellants were afforded, but declined, the court’s invitation to offer into evidence a defense-produced video tape of the…
• United States v. Marler, 756 F.2d 206 (1st Cir. 1985)
  …trict court that the destruction of the scene of the incident did not prejudice Marler because not only is the granting of a jury view a matter of discretion, see, e.g., United [*214] States v. Bryant, 563 F. 2d 1227, 1230 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 972 [98 S.Ct. 1616, 56 L.Ed.2d 65] ..., but the government’s collection of schematic [scaled] drawings and both on-site and aerial photographs, in conjunction with the testimony of eyewitnesses, should suffice to familiarize the jury adequately with the…