ROBSON

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• United States v. Owens, 484 U.S. 554 (U.S. 1988)
  …ss both with respect to the Confrontation Clause, see, e. g., United States ex rel. Thomas v. Cuyler, 548 F. 2d 460, 462-463 (CA3 1977), and with respect to Rule 802, see, e. g., United States v. Lewis, 565 F. 2d 1248, 1252 (CA2 1977), cert. denied, 435 U. S. 973 (1978). II The Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment gives the accused the right “to be confronted with the witnesses against him.” This has long been read as securing an adequate opportunity to cross-examine adverse witnesses. See, e. g., M…
• United States v. Milan Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42 (2d Cir. 1983)
  …could have better prepared his cross-examination and further time would have assisted him in “undoubtedly numerous other ways.” This vague allegation is insufficient, see United States v. Lewis, 565 F. 2d 1248, 1252-53 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 973, 98 S.Ct. 1618, 56 L.Ed.2d 66 (1978), to persuade us the district court abused its discretion in denying the motion for a continuance. Sudar’s other claims may be considered summarily in this footnote. The refusal to charge the jury that it must fi…
• United States v. Ochs, 595 F.2d 1247 (2d Cir. 1979)
  …“investigative” for a case to which Chadwick is clearly applicable. Shortly after Chadwick was handed down, this Court held that the decision was not to be given retroactive effect. United States v. Reda, 563 F. 2d 510 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 973, 98 S.Ct. 1617, 56 L.Ed.2d 65 (1978). See also United States v. Diaz, 577 F. 2d 821, 824 (2d Cir. 1978). The Reda panel relied on United States v. Peltier, 422 U.S. 531, 95 S.Ct. 2313, 45 L.Ed.2d 374 (1975), in which the Supreme Court addressed…

  ← 1 / 3 →