DONOVAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY OF MINNESOTA

v.

FLORIDA TELEPHONE CORP.

Citator

Cited By (22 total)

• Amey, Inc. v. Gulf Abstract & Title, Inc., 758 F.2d 1486 (11th Cir. 1985)
  …450 U.S. 1030, 101 S.Ct. 1740, 68 L.Ed.2d 226 (1981); Larry R. George Sales Co. v. Cool Attic Corp., 587 F. 2d 266 (5th Cir.1979); Donovan Construction Co. of Minnesota v. Florida Telephone Corp., 564 F. 2d 1191 [*1496] (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1007, 98 S.Ct. 1878, 56 L.Ed.2d 389 (1978); Yoder Brothers, Inc. v. California-Florida Plant Corp., 537 F. 2d 1347 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1094, 97 S.Ct. 1108, 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977). See also Blue Shield, 457 U.S. at 478 n. 14, 102 S.Ct. a…
• United States v. Freeman, 619 F.2d 1112 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …tten by an investor, who did not testify, in response to an IDC letter, and was used to cross-examine Mr. Temp concerning his defense of good faith. See generally, e. g., United States v. Bibbs, 564 F. 2d 1165, 1168-69 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1007, 98 S.Ct. 1877, 56 L.Ed.2d 388 (1978). It was not hearsay because it was not offered to prove the truth of its contents. Appellants challenge exclusion of their proffered evidence of intent. (1) They sought to introduce a book on oil property inv…
• Moore v. United States, 598 F.2d 439 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …ppeal, a defendant is thereafter precluded from urging the same issues in a later collateral attack. E. g., Buckelew v. United States, 5 Cir. 1978, 575 F. 2d 515, 517-18; Vernell v. United States, 5 Cir. 1977, 559 F. 2d 963, 964, cert. denied, 1978, 435 U.S. 1007, 98 S.Ct. 1876, 56 L.Ed.2d 388; Blackwell v. United States, 5 Cir. 1970, 429 F. 2d 514, 516. A defendant is, of course, entitled to a hearing of his claims, but not to duplicate hearings. The appellate process does not permit reruns. We are not, ho…