CECIL

v.

UNITED STATES; AND MANZER V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. German Munoz-Flores, 863 F.2d 654 (9th Cir. 1988)
  ….2d 57 (1969); State v. Block, 717 F. 2d 874 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1080, 104 S.Ct. 1444, 79 L.Ed.2d 764 (1984); Swearingen v. United States, 565 F.Supp. 1019 (D.Colo.1983); Edwards v. Carter, 580 F. 2d 1055 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 907, 98 S.Ct. 2240, 56 L.E'd.2d 406 (1978). Recently, the controversy surrounding the passage of the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA) has produced a large number of origination clause cases. These cases have uniformly upheld TE…
• Schnapper v. Foley, 667 F.2d 102 (D.C. Cir. 1981)
  …article IV, section 3, this court has held, was “to preserve both federal claims and conflicting state claims to certain portions of’’ unsettled lands west of the Allegheny Mountains. Edwards v. Carter, 580 F. 2d 1055, 1059 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 907, 98 S.Ct. 2240, 56 L.Ed.2d 406 (1978). Although the historical basis of the Property Clause may not limit congressional power to legislate with respect to it, 580 F. 2d at 1059, it does serve to narrow the class of persons who can predicate standing…
• Senator Barry Goldwater v. Carter, 617 F.2d 697 (D.C. Cir. 1979)
  …S.App.D.C. at 64, 553 F. 2d at 209. The flaw of Mitchell’s “relevancy” standard is that it ignores Article Ill’s demand of proof of a distinct injury. Two other cases deserve note here. In Edwards v. Carter, 580 F. 2d 1055 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 907, 98 S.Ct. 2240, 56 L.Ed.2d 406 (1978), we proceeded to the merits of a congressmen’s suit against the President. But there we chose not to address the standing issue at all, since, under constraints peculiar to that case, rejection of the plaintiffs…