DESANTIS

v.

UNITED STATES; BOSCIA V. UNITED STATES; SCOLIERI V. UNITED STATES; AND PLUSQUELLEC V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (57 total)

• United States v. Bailey, 444 U.S. 394 (U.S. 1980)
  …s or necessity unless and until he demonstrates that, given the imminence of the threat, violation of § 751 (a) was his only reasonable alternative. See United States v. Boomer, 571 F. 2d 543, 545 (CA10), cert. denied sub nom. Heft v. United States, 436 U. S. 911 (1978); People v. Richards, 269 Cal. App. 2d 768, 75 Cal. Rptr. 597 (1969). In the present case, the Government contends that respondents’ showing was insufficient on two grounds. First, the Government asserts that the threats and conditions cited…
• In re McDONALD, 489 U.S. 180 (U.S. 1989)
  …. 933 (1981); McDonald v. United States District Court, 444 U. S. 900 (1979); McDonald v. Birch, 444 U. S. 875 (1979); McDonald v. United States District Court and McDonald v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc., 444 U. S. 875 (1979); McDonald v. Thompson, 436 U. S. 911 (1978); McDonald v. Tennessee, 434 U. S. 866 (1977); McDonald v. Davidson County Election Comm’n, 431 U. S. 958 (1977); McDonald v. Tennessee, 431 U. S. 933 (1977); McDonald v. Tennessee, 429 U. S. 1064 (1977); McDonald v. Tennessee, 425 U. S. 955 (…
• Hobson v. Wilson, 737 F.2d 1 (D.C. Cir. 1984)
  …a defendant’s communication with an excused juror, the excused juror telephoned a sitting juror to recount the conversation, who then repeated what was said to other jur [*49] ors. See United States v. Boscia, 573 F. 2d 827 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 911, 98 S.Ct. 2248, 56 L.Ed.2d 411. (1978). If this were the only thing to be feared, we might have some reservations about a rule that any discussion between an excused juror and any third party, about the merits of the case, necessarily creates a pres…