LOUIS WILLIAMS, PETITIONER,

v.

BARRON ROOFING COMPANY, U. S. FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY, AND F. I. C., RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By (77 total)

• Brewer v. State, 386 So. 2d 232 (Fla. 1980)
  …2d 553 (Fla.1973). Once it is established that there were coercive influences attendant upon an initial confession, the coercion is presumed to continue “unless clearly shown to have been removed prior to a subsequent confession.” State v. Outten, 206 So. 2d 392, 396 (Fla.1968). The inquiry is whether, under the circumstances, the influence of the coercion that produced the first confession was dissipated so that the second confession was the voluntary act of a free will. See, e. g., Darwin v. Connecticut,…
• Harrel Franklin Braddy v. State, 111 So. 3d 810 (Fla. 2012)
  …that there were coercive influences attendant upon an initial confession [or incriminating statement], the coercion is presumed to continue ‘unless clearly shown to have been removed prior to a subsequent confession.’ ” Id. (quoting State v. Outten, 206 So. 2d 392, 396 (Fla.1968)). See also Coffee v. State, 25 Fla. 501, 6 So. 493, 496 (1889) (“[W]hen a confession has ... been made under illegal influences, such influences will be presumed to continue and color all subsequent confessions, unless the contrary i…
• Shriner v. State, 386 So. 2d 525 (Fla. 1980)
  …tention is that his arrest was illegal because of a lack of probable cause. We disagree. A law enforcement officer has probable cause to arrest if he has reasonable grounds to believe that the person arrested has committed a felony. State v. Outten, 206 So. 2d 392, 397 (Fla.1968). The facts constituting probable cause need not meet the standard of conclusiveness and probability required of the circumstantial facts upon which a conviction must be based. Id. Here, the sketches attached to the police BOLO bore a…