PETERSON

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (46 total)

• United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578 (3d Cir. 1982)
  …upreme Court and other decisions, is whether the defendant evidenced reluctance to engage in criminal activity which was overcome by repeated Government inducement.” United States v. Reynoso-Ulloa, 548 F. 2d 1329, 1336 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 926, 98 S.Ct. 2820, 56 L.Ed.2d 769 (1978). The court stated, “We have found no case in which the defense of entrapment (as opposed to cases dealing with due process principles) was successful where the defendant had not indicated reluctance to engage in…
• Jacobson v. United States, 503 U.S. 540 (U.S. 1992)
  …e most important factor ... is whether the defendant evidenced reluctance to engage in criminal activity which was overcome by repeated Government inducement’ ”) (quoting United States v. Reynoso-Ulloa, 548 F. 2d 1329, 1336 (CA9 1977), cert. denied, 436 U. S. 926 (1978)); United States v. Sherman, 200 F. 2d 880, 882 (CA2 1952) (indication of pre [*555] disposition is a defendant’s willingness to commit the offense “ ‘as evinced by ready complaisance’ ” (citation omitted)). The first time the Government sent…
• Int'l Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Donovan, 722 F.2d 795 (D.C. Cir. 1983)
  …of the Safety Act.”), vacated sub nom. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass’n v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 2856, 77 L.Ed.2d 443 (1983); National Citizens Comm. for Broadcasting v. FCC, 567 F. 2d 1095, 1115 (D.C.Cir.1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 926, 98 S.Ct. 2820, 56 L.Ed.2d 769 (1978); Pillai v. CAB, 485 F. 2d 1018, 1027 (D.C.Cir.1973). . While the foregoing discussion provides the clearest basis for our holding that the Secretary’s decision was arbitrary and capricious, the discussion in se…