FRAZEE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. McLERNON, 746 F.2d 1098 (6th Cir. 1984)
  …vidence of Valdez’s prearrest statements. Neither does the prohibition against the admission into evidence of prior bad acts preclude admission of Valdez’s remarks in this case. In United States v. Pope, 574 F. 2d 320, 328 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 929, 98 S.Ct. 2828, 56 L.Ed.2d 774 (1978), this Court held that the “scope of the conspiracy itself ... does not necessarily limit the application of the co-conspirator exception.” The broad scope of evidence relevant to the plan, design, and nature of…
• United States v. Capua, 656 F.2d 1033 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …reurging it immediately before the commencement of the trial testimony. Only such a request triggers the duty of the trial court to conduct the supplemental voir dire. Id. at 303-04; United States v. Eldridge, 569 F. 2d 319 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 929, 98 S.Ct. 2827, 56 L.Ed.2d 773 (1978); United States v. Price, 573 F. 2d at 363 & n.22. We assume, for purposes of this opinion, that, at the outset of his trial, Capua adequately alerted the trial judge to his objections to the jury selection proc…
• United States v. Sutton, 605 F.2d 260 (6th Cir. 1979)
  …ses as a rule of evidence and that evidence as to the acts of co-conspirators can be used in support of a substantive count, even though the indictment does not allege a conspiracy. United States v. Pope, 574 F. 2d 320, 328 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 929, 949, 98 S.Ct. 2828, 56 L.Ed.2d 774, 98 S.Ct. 2856, 56 L.Ed.2d 792 (1978); United States v. Mitchell, 556 F. 2d 371, 377 n. 6 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 925, 98 S.Ct. 406, 54 L.Ed.2d 284 (1977); United States v. Jones, 542 F. 2d 186, 202 n.…