SMITH

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (23 total)

• United States v. Severo D. Espinosa, 771 F.2d 1382 (10th Cir. 1985)
  …ellate review is appropriate “when a trial court fails to afford individual treatment, imposes a sentence mechanically, or refuses to consider all the mitigating circumstances.” United States v. Davis, 573 F. 2d 1177, 1182 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 930, 98 S.Ct. 2829, 56 L.Ed.2d 775 (1978). However, “a sentencing judge has considerable discretion and leeway in determining, from the totality of the circumstances, the extent of the individual punishment to be meted out for each offense committed.” I…
• United States v. Franjo Ivic, 700 F.2d 51 (2d Cir. 1983)
  …ebt. When the same word is used in the same section of an act more than once, and the meaning is clear in one place, it will be assumed to have the same meaning in other places. See United States v. Nunez, 573 F. 2d 769, 771 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 930, 98 S.Ct. 2828, 56 L.Ed.2d 774 (1978), and eases cited there. As it appears in subsections (a) and (b), the term “enterprise” quite clearly refers .to the sort of entity in which funds can be invested and a property interest of some sort acquired, a…
• United States v. Henry, 709 F.2d 298 (5th Cir. 1983)
  …tates v. Marino, 682 F. 2d 449, 455 n. 9 (3d Cir. 1982); United States v. Pinto, 646 F. 2d 833, 838 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 816, 102 S.Ct. 94, 70 L.Ed.2d 85 (1981); United States v. Davis, 573 F. 2d 1177, 1180-82 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 930, 98 S.Ct. 2829, 56 L.Ed.2d 775 (1978); United States v. Moore, 540 F. 2d 1088, 1091 (D.C.Cir.1976); United States v. Calhoun, 510 F. 2d 861, 870 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 950, 95 S.Ct. 1683, 44 L.Ed.2d 104 (1975). These cases, furthermore,…

  ← 1 / 2 →