CHICO ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. ROY, 771 F.2d 54 (2d Cir. 1985)
  …that his trial in the receiving state will be handled expeditiously, the speedy trial provision of article IV(c) reduces the uncertainties created by the pending charges. See United States v. Chico, 558 F. 2d 1047, 1048 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 947, 98 S.Ct. 2850, 56 L.Ed.2d 788 (1978). By requiring the receiving state to try the prisoner before returning him to the “original place of imprisonment,” article IV(e) tries to minimize disruption of the sending state’s rehabilitation program. Id. a…
• United States v. Montemayor, 684 F.2d 1118 (5th Cir. 1982)
  …hat the government was cheating. United States v. Hiett, 581 F. 2d at 1204. Nor is a prosecutor’s expression of personal zeal for law enforcement normally prejudicial error. United States v. Ochoa, 564 F. 2d 1155, 1159 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 947, 98 S.Ct. 2853, 57 L.Ed.2d 789 (1978). 5. The Paralegal and Scott. The final act of asserted misconduct concerns a passing comment regarding Montemayor’s training of paralegals. In the prosecutor’s closing argument, he stated: “Now, let me ask you…
• United States ex rel. Clarence Rivers v. Franzen, 692 F.2d 491 (7th Cir. 1982)
  …v. Wainwright, 600 F. 2d 1085, 1093 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 983, 100 S.Ct. 487, 62 L.Ed.2d 410 (1979). . The respondents’ reliance on McCravy v. Lane, 444 F.Supp. 240 (E.D.Tenn.), aff’d mem., 573 F. 2d 1310 (6th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 947, 98 S.Ct. 2851, 56 L.Ed.2d 789 (1978), and Howell v. United States, 282 F.Supp. 246 (N.D.Ill.1968), aff'd, 442 F. 2d 265 (7th Cir. 1971), is misplaced. McCravy merely states that the state court’s factual determinations supported the conclusion that…