MILLER

v.

AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Parent, 408 So. 2d 612 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981)
  …ation, and discharged her. A delay by the state prior to the filing of an information can so adversely affect a defendant’s right to prepare a defense that it will deny him the fourteenth amendment’s guarantee of due process.1 Swan v. United States, 436 U.S. 958, 98 S.Ct. 3073, 57 L.Ed.2d 1123 (1978); United States v. Lovasco, 431 U.S. 783, 97 S.Ct. [*614] 2044, 52 L.Ed.2d 752 (1977); State v. Bennett, 382 So. 2d 811 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); State v. Griffin, 347 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), cert. denied, 358…
• United States v. Blevins, 593 F.2d 646 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …r both the actual prejudice to the accused and the reasons for the delay. United States v. Lovasco, 431 U.S. at 789-90, 97 S.Ct. 2044, 52 L.Ed.2d 752; United States v. West, 568 F. 2d 365, 367 (5th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Swan v. United States, 436 U.S. 958, 98 S.Ct. 3073, 57 L.Ed.2d 1123 (1978). As our decisions make clear, e. g., United States v. West, supra, prejudice to the accused is the threshold criterion, and it is this requirement that Blevins has failed to establish. He makes only general a…
• United States v. Surface, 624 F.2d 23 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …delay, consider both the reasons for the delay and the prejudice to the accused. But in identifying a violation, prejudice to the accused is the threshold criterion.” U. S. v. West, 568 F. 2d 365, 367 (5th Cir.) cert. denied sub nom., Swan v. U. S., 436 U.S. 958, 98 S.Ct. 3073, 57 L.Ed.2d 1123 (1978); see U. S. v. Medina-Arrellano, 569 F. 2d 349 (5th Cir. 1978); cf. U. S. v. Lovasco, 431 U.S. at 790, 97 S.Ct. at 2049, 52 L.Ed.2d at 759 (proof of prejudice “generally necessary”); U. S. v. Avalos, 541 F. 2d 1…