LEONARD C. FELDMAN, PETITIONER,

v.

STEWARD LINCOLN-MERCURY CO., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Edmond Boris Shell v. State, 501 So. 2d 1332 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)
  …an, that truly responds to Shell’s motion. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. If the state’s answer does not refute Shell’s claim, then the trial court must hold a hearing to give Shell an opportunity to present evidence in support of his claims. Thomas v. State, 206 So. 2d 475 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968). If the trial court should again deny Shell’s motion, he has thirty days in which to appeal. Reversed and remanded with instructions. RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and SANDERLIN, JJ., concur.…
• Glimmert Beckham v. State, 353 So. 2d 941 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
  …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See: Thomas v. State, 206 So. 2d 475 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968); Brown v. State, 227 So. 2d 527 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969); Kish v. State, 253 So. 2d 889 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971); Phillips v. State, 313 So. 2d 428 (Fla.3d DCA 1975).…
• Boisvert v. State, 693 So. 2d 652 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)
  …irrelevant. Boisvert, although having the opportunity to testify as to what the attorney told him and be subjected to cross examination, gave no such testimony. He cannot be heard on it here. A similar issue was before the court in Thomas v. State, 206 So. 2d 475, 476 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968), in which the court stated: While it might be true that each and every ground for relief included in the motion is not shown by the transcript of the hearing to have been presented or argued, the transcript does conclusively…

Authorities Cited

• Broward Cnty. Port Auth. v. F. M. Rule & Co., 119 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960)