MCADAMS, EXECUTOR, ET AL.

v.

MCSURELY ET UX.

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731 (U.S. 1982)
  …e); McSurely v. McClellan, 172 U. S. App. D. C. 364, 372, 521 F. 2d 1024, 1032 (1975), aff’d in pertinent part en banc, 180 U. S. App. D. C. 101, 107-108, n. 18, 553 F. 2d 1277, 1283-1284, n. 18 (1976), cert. dism’d sub nom. McAdams v. McSurely, 438 U. S. 189 (1978). In “dismissing” the appeal in this case, the Court of Appeals appears to have reasoned that petitioner’s appeal lay [*743] outside the Cohen doctrine because it raised no “serious and unsettled question” of law. This argument was pressed by…
• Forsyth v. Kleindienst, 599 F.2d 1203 (3d Cir. 1979)
  …ined’ if appellate review had to await final action in the case.” Id. See also McSurely v. McClellan, 172 U.S.App. D.C. 364, 521 F. 2d 1024, 1032 (1975), en banc, 180 U.S.App.D.C. 101, 553 F. 2d 1277 (1976), cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 438 U.S. 189, 98 S.Ct. 3116, 57 L.Ed.2d 704 (1978) (on appeal from denial of motion to dismiss for absolute immunity under the Speech & Debate Clause, “the question of appealability does not turn on the correctness of an appellant’s claim[s]”). Furthermore, def…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• McSURELY v. McCLELLAN, 697 F.2d 309 (D.C. Cir. 1982)
  …the McSurelys. On appeal, we assumed jurisdiction to review the district court’s interlocutory order under 28 U.S.C. § 1291; we affirmed in part and reversed in part. McSurely v. McClellan, 553 F. 2d 1277 (D.C.Cir.1976) (en banc), cert. dismissed, 438 U.S. 189, 98 S.Ct. 3116, 57 L.Ed.2d 704 (1978). We rejected the claim that the federal defendants’ conduct was completely insulated from judicial scrutiny by the Speech and Debate Clause, but found that several of the McSurelys’ allegations implicated legisl…

  ← 1 / 4 →