CANNON

v.

UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• The Tallahassee Democrat, Inc. v. The Honorable Ben C. Willis, 370 So. 2d 867 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)
  …mitted by the rules. We are aware of no authority that would give the press rights of access to sealed depositions superi- or to those enjoyed by the members of the public generally. Cf. Garrett v. Estelle, 556 F. 2d 1274 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. den. 438 U.S. 914, 98 S.Ct. 3142, 57 L.Ed.2d 1159 (1978). While we find ample authority as the reviewing court under Rule 9.100(d), Fla.R. App.P., to determine validity of the administrative order in question, we note that such reviewing authority has been exercised…
• Cannon v. Univ. of Chicago, 441 U.S. 677 (U.S. 1979)
  …e truth of those allegations for the purpose of its decision, the Court of Appeals held that petitioner has no right of action against respondents that may be asserted in a federal court. 559 F. 2d 1063. We granted certiorari to review that holding. 438 U. S. 914. Only two facts alleged in the complaints are relevant to our decision. First, petitioner was excluded from participation in the respondents’ medical education programs because of her sex. Second, these education programs were receiving federal fin…
• Marshall v. Lonberger, 459 U.S. 422 (U.S. 1983)
  …er, where the existence of prior convictions is not an aggravating circumstance. N. Y. Penal Law § 125.27(1) (a)(iii) (McKinney 1975) (see People v. Davis, 43 N. Y. 2d 17, and n. 3, 371 N. E. 2d 456, and n. 3 (1977), cert. denied, 435 U. S. 998 and 438 U. S. 914 (1978)); Vt. Stat. Ann., Tit. 13, § 2303(c) (Supp. 1982); Wash. Rev. Code § 10.95.020 (1981). It is significant that under the “habitual criminal” statutes in all three States, where prior convictions are in effect “aggravating circumstances,” bifur…