DOWNTOWN L. A. IMPORTS ET AL.
v.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES (YOUNGER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, REAL PARTY IN INTEREST)

U.S. | 1978-10-02
No. 77-1743
439 U.S. 803 Supreme Court of the United States (1978) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Selected Risks Ins. Co. v. Bruno, 718 F.2d 67 (3d Cir. 1983)
    …remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. . See, e.g., Rogers v. Larson, 563 F. 2d 617, 620 n. 4 (3d Cir.1977) (rule may be relaxed whenever the public interest so warrants), appeal dismissed sub'nom Larsen v. Lockhart, 439 U.S. 803, 99 S.Ct. 57, 58 L.Ed.2d 95 (1978); Franki Foundation v. Alger-Rau Assoc., 513 F. 2d 581, 586 (3d Cir.1975) (same). . Holding that insurance policies are “contracts of adhesion,” Eastcoast Equipment Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co., 38 Pa.D. & C.2d 499…
  • …congressional delegation. The Department is obliged to balance the competing goals of the statute— providing an adequate labor supply and protecting the jobs of domestic workers. See Rogers v. Larson, 563 F. 2d 617, 626 (3rd Cir.1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 803, 99 S.Ct. 57, 58 L.Ed.2d 95 (1978). Striking that balance is a judgment call which Congress entrusted to the Department of Labor. See Brock, 835 F. 2d at 915 n. 5; see also Shoreham Cooperative Apple Producers Ass’n v. Donovan, 764 F. 2d 135, 141-14…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw