JOHNSON ET AL.

v.

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Brooks v. Md. Gen. Hosp., 996 F.2d 708 (4th Cir. 1993)
  …, 732, 594 A. 2d 1152 (1991); see also Attorney General v. Johnson, 282 Md. 274, 308, 385 A. 2d 57 (1978) (the Act was intended to encourage more rapid resolution of claims and therefore to lower both costs and insurance premiums), appeal dismissed, 439 U.S. 805, 99 S.Ct. 60, 58 L.Ed.2d 97 (1978), overruled in part on a different point in Newell v. Richards, supra. More specifically, the Act provides that “[a]ll claims, suits, and actions ... by a person against a health care provider for medical injury” m…
• Preston v. Seay, 684 F.2d 172 (1st Cir. 1982)
  …ot affect the present analysis. The district court considered itself bound by the Supreme Court’s dismissals of two similar attacks on section 24 for want of a substantial federal question. See Francis v. Massachusetts and O’Clair v. Massachusetts, 439 U.S. 805, 99 S.Ct. 61, 58 L.Ed.2d 97 (1978). Preston argues that these cases are not apposite. We disagree. The fact that review was sought in Francis and O’Clair via appeal rather than certiorari does not, as Preston claims, preclude their challenge from b…