ARTHUR ET AL.

v.

CLAY COMMUNITY SCHOOLS ET AL.; AND TOLIN ET AL. V. SOUTHWEST PARKE COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORP. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• van Sickle v. Judges William J. Holloway, 791 F.2d 1431 (10th Cir. 1986)
  …ickle’s lawsuits and affirming those dismissals on appeal. See Conrad v. Wangelin, 441 F.Supp. 345, 345-46 (E.D.Mo.1977) (dismissal of an action and the affirmance on appeal are considered judicial acts protected by judicial immunity), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 806, 99 S.Ct. 63, 58 L.Ed.2d 99 (1978). Consequently, the doctrine of judicial immunity precludes recovery by Van Sickle from these defendants. The other judges, who apparently were named as defendants only because of their positions on the federal dis…
• Lovett v. Shuster, 633 F.2d 98 (8th Cir. 1980)
  …is clear that “the procedure which must be followed in perfecting a security interest in the property of a bankrupt is determined in accordance with state law.” In Re Vodco Volume Development Co., 567 F. 2d 967, 970 (10th Cir. 1977), appeal dism’d, 439 U.S. 806, 99 S.Ct. 62, 58 L.Ed.2d 98 (1978). We therefore turn to the law of Minnesota to determine the appropriate procedure for perfecting the security interest in the pledged collateral. Under Section 9-105(g) of the Minnesota Uniform Commercial Code, Mi…
• In re Tressler v. Baker, 771 F.2d 791 (3d Cir. 1985)
  …83).1 To determine whether Union Bank perfected its security interest within the 10 day period established by § 547(e)(3)(B), we must look to state law. See In re Vodco Volume Development Co., Inc., 567 F. 2d 967, 960 (10th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 806, 99 S.Ct. 62, 58 L.Ed.2d 98 (1978). The Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Code, 75 Pa.Cons.Stat.Ann. § 1132(b), establishes the method by which a security interest in an automobile is perfected. It states that “[a] security interest is perfected by notat…