LITTLE

v.

NEBRASKA

Citator

Cited By

• Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City OF Durham, 844 F.2d 172 (4th Cir. 1988)
  …t [*174] “aesthetics alone is a sufficient justification” for this type of police power regulation. Waynesville, 833 F. 2d at 46; accord Modjeska Sign Studios, Inc. v. Berle, 43 N.Y.2d 468, 402 N.Y.S.2d 359, 373 N.E. 2d 255 (1977), appeal dismissed, 439 U.S. 809, 99 S.Ct. 66, 58 L.Ed.2d 101 (1978); Suffolk Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Hulse, 43 N.Y.2d 483, 402 N.Y.S.2d 368, 373 N.E. 2d 263 (1977), appeal dismissed, 439 U.S. 808, 99 S.Ct. 66, 58 L.Ed.2d 101 (1978). Contrary to Naegele’s contention, the locatio…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• John Donnelly & Sons v. Campbell, 639 F.2d 6 (1st Cir. 1980)
  …600 P. 2d 258, 446 U.S. 930, 100 S.Ct. 2145, 64 L.Ed.2d 783, appeal dismissed; State v. Lotze, ante; Newman Signs, Inc. v. Hjelle, ante; Modjeska Sign Studios, Inc. v. Berle, 1977, 43 N.Y.2d 468, 402 N.Y.S.2d 359, 373 N.E. 2d 255, appeal dismissed, 439 U.S. 809, 99 S.Ct. 66, 58 L.Ed.2d 101; Markham Advertising Co. v. State, ante; Ghaster Properties, Inc. v. Preston, ante. Since billboards are profitable only in terms of exposure, one does not see many of them on the secondary roads that concerned the major…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• George v. Parratt, 602 F.2d 818 (8th Cir. 1979)
  …fs’ situation. That is to say the Nebraska courts may hold there is no right to good time credit where, as here, the purpose of incarceration is not punishment but treatment. Cf. State v. Little, 199 Neb. 772, 261 N.W. 2d 847, 851, appeal dismissed, 439 U.S. 809, 99 S.Ct. 67, 58 L.Ed.2d 101 (1978); State v. Irwin, supra, 191 Neb. 169, 214 N.W. 2d 595. Moreover, the Nebraska courts may hold that just as good time credit cannot be calculated for those sentenced to life, it cannot be calculated for. those sen…

  ← 1 / 2 →