HERNANDEZ

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By (73 total)

• State v. Fuksman, 468 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …, middle-aged businessman, agreed and unlocked the door. Clearly, the greater weight of the evidence established a free and voluntary consent to search the automobile. Denehy; see also United States v. Almand, 565 F. 2d 927 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 824, 99 S.Ct. 92, 58 L.Ed.2d 116 (1978) (unlocking of vehicle sufficient to support finding of consent). Our next inquiry is whether the consent to search the car extended to the locked briefcase within the car. The state cites State v. Wargin, 418 So.…
• Groover v. State, 458 So. 2d 226 (Fla. 1984)
  …cy of fostering frank discussion between prosecution and defense require extending protection to statements made in fulfillment of an agreed-to bargain. In a strikingly similar case, United States v. Stirling, 571 F. 2d 708 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 824, 99 S.Ct. 93, 58 L.Ed.2d 116 (1978), one defendant agreed to plead guilty to one charge and to testify truthfully before the grand jury in exchange for dismissal of any other counts charged. He testified immediately after agreeing to the bargain and…
• Steadman v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, 450 U.S. 91 (U.S. 1981)
  …subject to § 554. See United States v. Florida East Coast R. Co., 410 U. S. 224, 238 (1973); United States v. Allegheny-Ludlum Steel Corp., 406 U. S. 742, 757 (1972); Seacoast Anti-Pollution League v. Costle, 572 F. 2d 872, 876 (CA1), cert. denied, 439 U. S. 824 (1978). Rather, the “on the record” requirement for § 80a-9 (b) is satisfied by the substantive content of the adjudication. Title 15 U. S. C. § 80a-42 provides for judicial review of Commission orders issued pursuant to § 80a-9 (b). Substantia…