THOMPSON

v.

SHAW ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (34 total)

• United States v. Williams, 737 F.2d 594 (7th Cir. 1984)
  …ully challenge the admissibility of evidence on the basis that the evidence is tainted (or “the fruit of”) some past infringement of another’s rights. See United States v. Williams, 580 F. 2d 578, 583 n. 21 (D.C.Cir.) (Title III case), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 832, 99 S.Ct. 112, 58 L.Ed.2d 127 (1978); United States v. Wright, 524 F. 2d 1100, 1102 (2d Cir.1975) (same); see also United States v. Chase, 692 F. 2d 69, 70 (9th Cir.1982) (Fourth Amendment standing law); United States v. Hansen, 652 F. 2d 1374, 1386…
• Aladdin OIL Co. v. Texaco, Inc., 603 F.2d 1107 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …nc), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946, 99 S.Ct. 340, 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978); Northwest Power Products, Inc. v. Omark Industries, 576 F. 2d 83, 87 (5th Cir. 1978); Dillon Materials Handling Inc. v. Albion Industries, 567 F. 2d 1299 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 832, 99 S.Ct. 111, 58 L.Ed.2d 127 (1978); Universal Brands, Inc. v. Philip Morris, Inc., 546 F. 2d 30, 33 (5th Cir. 1977); Dreibus v. Wilson, 529 F. 2d 170 (9th Cir. 1975). But cf. Cernuto, Inc. v. United Cabinet Corp., 595 F. 2d 164 (3d Cir. 1979).…
• United States v. Robinson, 698 F.2d 448 (D.C. Cir. 1983)
  …. The affidavit must show with specificity why in this particular investigation ordinary means of investigation will fail. See United States v. Johnson, supra, 696 F. 2d at 124; United States v. Williams, 580 F. 2d 578, 588 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 832, 99 S.Ct. 112, 58 L.Ed.2d 127 (1978). The government here provided detailed information about two confidential sources that were reluctant to testify, the various means that had already been tried (including pen registers, seizures of trash, and und…