MCCURRY

v.

TEXAS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (25 total)

• Missouri v. Hunter, 459 U.S. 359 (U.S. 1983)
  …issue first arose, the Missouri Supreme Court took the position that multiple convictions for both armed criminal action and the underlying felony did not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause. State v. Treadway, 558 S. W. 2d 646 (1977), cert. denied, 439 U. S. 838 (1978); State v. Valentine, 584 S. W. 2d 92 (1979). The Missouri Supreme Court has recently made clear that “in order to establish uniformity of sentencing in Sours type cases, the armed criminal action sentence should be reversed in all instances.…
• Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263 (2d Cir. 1979)
  …arkets It is clear that a firm may not employ its market position as a lever to create — or attempt to create — a monopoly in another market. See, e. g., Griffith, supra; Smith-Kline Corp. v. Eli Lilly & Co., 575 F. 2d 1056 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 838, 99 S.Ct. 123, 58 L.Ed.2d 134 (1978). Kodak, in the period relevant to this suit, was never close to gaining control of the markets for photofinishing equipment or services and could not be held to have attempted to monopolize them.13 Berkey neverth…
• LOS Angeles Mem'l Coliseum Comm'n v. Nat'l Football League, 726 F.2d 1381 (9th Cir. 1984)
  …ket definition must look at all relevant sources of supply, either actual rivals or eager potential entrants to the market. [*1393] Kaplan, 611 F. 2d at 292 (quoting SmithK-line Corp. v. Eli Lilly & Co., 575 F. 2d 1056, 1063 (3d Cir.), cert, denied, 439 U.S. 838, 99 S.Ct. 123, 58 L.Ed.2d 134 (1978)). Two related tests are used in arriving at the product market: first, reasonable interchangeability for the same or similar uses; and second, cross-elasticity of demand, an economic term describing the responsiv…