JAMES W. DOUGLAS, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• Belton v. State, 217 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 1968)
  …r v. State, 214 So. 2d 52 (2d Dist.Ct.App.Fla.1968), where the Second District Court of Appeal modified its earlier view as stated in Williams v. State, 214 So. 2d 29 (2d Dist.Ct.App.Fla.1968). A different view has been taken in Youngblood v. State, 206 So. 2d 665 (4th Dist.Ct.App.Fla.1968). We find that the District Court correctly disposed of the matter. Its decision is approved and the writ is discharged. It is so ordered. CALDWELL, C. J., and DREW, ERVIN and HOPPING, JJ., concur.…
• State v. Youngblood, 217 So. 2d 98 (Fla. 1968)
  …THORNAL, Justice. By petition for certiorari we have for review a decision of a district court of appeal which allegedly conflicts with a decision of this Court on the same point of law. Fla.Const. art. V, § 4, F.S.A.; Youngblood v. State, 206 So. 2d 665 (4th Dist.Ct.App.Fla.1968). We are confronted by a claim of alleged fundamental error because of failure to appoint separate counsel for indigent code-fendants. Respondents Youngblood and Campbell were charged with robbery. They were represented j…
• Rhome v. State, 222 So. 2d 431 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969)
  …h, it was within the trial court’s discretion to [*434] allow an additional witness who had not been endorsed by name on the information or indictment, or whose name had not been supplied to the defendant, to testify. Douglas v. State, Fla.App.1968, 206 So. 2d 665; State v. Shouse, Fla.App.1965, 177 So. 2d 724. Neither bad faith nor abuse of discretion has been demonstrated by the appellant. Therefore, as to this point, the denial of the appellant’s motion to suppress or strike the testimony was proper. Base…

Authorities Cited

• State v. Shouse, 177 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)
• Shields v. State, 64 So. 2d 271 (Fla. 1953)