THRASHER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (43 total)

• Rhodes v. State, 547 So. 2d 1201 (Fla. 1989)
  …ness, counsel is required to demonstrate to the court that a good-faith factual basis exists for asking the question. See Butler v. State, 376 So. 2d 937 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979) (citing United States v. Bynum, 566 F. 2d 914 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 840, 99 S.Ct. 129, 130, 58 L.Ed.2d 138 (1978)); C. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 405.1 (2d Ed.1984). The record discloses that the prosecutor simply informed the court that he wished to ask the question about the incident but provided nothing to substan…
• Maugeri v. State, 460 So. 2d 975 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
  …sougrakis;6 United States v. Atkins, 558 F. 2d 133 (3rd Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1071, 98 S.Ct. 1254, 55 [*980] L.Ed.2d 774 (1978); United States v. Brainard; but see United States v. Satterfield, 572 F. 2d 687 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 840, 99 S.Ct. 128, 58 L.Ed.2d 138 (1978). Finally, we reject Maugeri’s claims that the final sentence of section 90.-804(2)(c)7 precludes the admission of all in-culpatory statements against penal interest. This provision was derived from one included…
• United States v. Berkowitz, 662 F.2d 1127 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …subjected to a co-defendant’s hostile witnesses and adverse cross-examinations, which might occur in every case of antagonistic, but not mutually exclusive, defenses. The court in United States v. Bynum, 566 F. 2d 914, 926 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 840,99 S.Ct. 129, 58 L.Ed.2d 138 (1978), in rejecting the claim that severance was mandated by mutually exclusive defenses noted that it was “not essential to [one defendant’s] defense, that the jury find [another defendant] guilty of the substantive of…