HAROLD WILLIAM ESTEP, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
HAROLD WILLIAM ESTEP, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
206 So. 2d 668
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1968)
Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s motion for relief pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix.
It is appellant’s contention that the trial court erred in denying him a full eviden-tiary hearing on his motion. We have carefully considered all points presented by appellant on appeal and find him to be without merit. See Mangram v. State, Fla.App.1965, 179 So.2d 243; Thompson v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 176 So.2d 564; Brookins v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 174 So.2d 578; Shannon v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 479; and Marti v. State, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 506.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Marti v. State, 163 So. 2d 506 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)
- Brookins v. State, 174 So. 2d 578 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)
- Thompson v. State, 176 So. 2d 564 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)
- Douzier Shannon v. State, 172 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)
- Mangram v. State, 179 So. 2d 243 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965)